Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
This project
Loading...
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
W
wine-cw
Project
Project
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Registry
Registry
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
wine
wine-cw
Commits
11ffcbaa
Commit
11ffcbaa
authored
Apr 11, 2005
by
Mike Hearn
Committed by
Alexandre Julliard
Apr 11, 2005
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
More notes about the inner workings of DCOM.
parent
acdc84e6
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
309 additions
and
31 deletions
+309
-31
ole.sgml
documentation/ole.sgml
+309
-31
No files found.
documentation/ole.sgml
View file @
11ffcbaa
...
...
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static ICOM_VTABLE(IDirect3D) d3dvt = {
</para>
<sect2>
<title>B
ASICS
</title>
<title>B
asics
</title>
<para>
The basic idea behind DCOM is to take a COM object and make it location
...
...
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static ICOM_VTABLE(IDirect3D) d3dvt = {
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>P
ROXIES AND STUBS
</title>
<title>P
roxies and Stubs
</title>
<para>
Manually marshalling and unmarshalling each method call using the NDR
...
...
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static ICOM_VTABLE(IDirect3D) d3dvt = {
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>I
NTERFACE MARSHALLING
</title>
<title>I
nterface Marshalling
</title>
<para>
Standard NDR only knows about C style function calls - they
...
...
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static ICOM_VTABLE(IDirect3D) d3dvt = {
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>COM P
ROXY/STUB SYSTEM
</title>
<title>COM P
roxy/Stub System
</title>
<para>
COM proxies are objects that implement both the interfaces needing to be
...
...
@@ -611,8 +611,7 @@ static ICOM_VTABLE(IDirect3D) d3dvt = {
names. I'm not sure either, except that a running theme in DCOM is that
interfaces which have nothing to do with buffers have the word Buffer
appended to them, seemingly at random. Ignore it and <emphasis>don't let it
confuse you</emphasis>
:) This stuff is convoluted enough ...
confuse you</emphasis> :) This stuff is convoluted enough ...
</para>
<para>
...
...
@@ -621,8 +620,8 @@ static ICOM_VTABLE(IDirect3D) d3dvt = {
</para>
<para>
DCOM is theoretically an internet RFC
<ulink
url="http://www.grimes.demon.co.uk/DCOM/DCOMSpec.htm">[2]</ulink> and is
DCOM is theoretically an internet RFC
<ulink
url="http://www.grimes.demon.co.uk/DCOM/DCOMSpec.htm">[2]</ulink> and is
specced out, but in reality the only implementation of it apart from
ours is Microsoft's, and as a result there are lots of interfaces
which <emphasis>can</emphasis> be used if you want to customize or
...
...
@@ -673,7 +672,7 @@ static ICOM_VTABLE(IDirect3D) d3dvt = {
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>RPC C
HANNELS
</title>
<title>RPC C
hannels
</title>
<para>
Remember the RPC runtime? Well, that's not just responsible for
...
...
@@ -718,7 +717,7 @@ static ICOM_VTABLE(IDirect3D) d3dvt = {
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>H
OW THIS ACTUALLY WORKS IN WINE
</title>
<title>H
ow this actually works in Wine
</title>
<para>
Right now, Wine does not use the NDR marshallers or RPC to implement its
...
...
@@ -743,7 +742,7 @@ static ICOM_VTABLE(IDirect3D) d3dvt = {
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>T
YPELIB MARSHALLER
</title>
<title>T
ypelib Marshaller
</title>
<para>
In fact, the reason for the PSFactoryBuffer layer of indirection is
...
...
@@ -790,48 +789,321 @@ static ICOM_VTABLE(IDirect3D) d3dvt = {
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>
WRAPUP
</title>
<title>
Appartments
</title>
<para>
OK, so there are some (very) basic notes on DCOM. There's a ton of stuff
I have not covered:
Before a thread can use COM it must enter an apartment. Apartments are
an abstraction of a COM objects thread safety level. There are many types
of apartment but the only two we care about right now are single threaded
apartments (STAs) and the multi-threaded apartment (MTA).
</para>
<para>
Any given process may contain at most one MTA and potentially many STAs.
This is because all objects in MTAs never care where they are invoked from
and hence can all be treated the same. Since objects in STAs do care, they
cannot be treated the same.
</para>
<para>
You enter an apartment by calling <function>CoInitializeEx()</function> and
passing the desired thread model in as a parameter. The default if you use
the deprecated <function>CoInitialize()</function> is a STA, and this is the
most common type of apartment used in COM.
</para>
<para>
An object in the multi-threaded apartment may be accessed concurrently by
multiple threads: eg, it's supposed to be entirely thread safe. It must also
not care about thread-affinity, the object should react the same way no matter
which thread is calling it.
</para>
<para>
An object inside a STA does not have to be thread safe, and all calls upon it
should come from the same thread - the thread that entered the apartment in
the first place.
</para>
<para>
The apartment system was originally designed to deal with the disparity between
the Windows NT/C++ world in which threading was given a strong emphasis, and the
Visual Basic world in which threading was barely supported and even if it had
been fully supported most developers would not have used it. Visual Basic code
is not truly multi-threaded, instead if you start a new thread you get an entirely
new VM, with separate sets of global variables. Changes made in one thread do
<emphasis>not</emphasis> reflect in another, which pretty much violates the
expected semantics of multi-threading entirely but this is Visual Basic, so what
did you expect? If you access a VB object concurrently from multiple threads,
behind the scenes each VM runs in a STA and the calls are marshaled between the
threads using DCOM.
</para>
<para>
In the Windows 2000 release of COM, several new types of apartment were added, the
most important of which are RTAs (the rental threaded apartment) in which concurrent
access are serialised by COM using an apartment-wide lock but thread affinity is
not guaranteed.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Structure of a marshaled interface pointer</title>
<para>
When an interface is marshaled using <function>CoMarshalInterface()</function>,
the result is a serialized OBJREF structure. An OBJREF actually contains a union,
but we'll be assuming the variant that embeds a STDOBJREF here which is what's
used by the system provided standard marshaling. A STDOBJREF (standard object
reference) consists of the magic signature 'MEOW', then some flags, then the IID
of the marshaled interface. Quite what MEOW stands for is a mystery, but it's
definitely not "Microsoft Extended Object Wire". Next comes the STDOBJREF flags,
identified by their SORF_ prefix. Most of these are reserved, and their purpose
(if any) is unknown, but a few are defined.
</para>
<para>
After the SORF flags comes a count of the references represented by this marshaled
interface. Typically this will be 5 in the case of a normal marshal, but may be 0
for table-strong and table-weak marshals (the difference between these is explained below).
The reasoning is this: In the general case, we want to know exactly when an object
is unmarshaled and released, so we can accurately control the lifetime of the stub
object. This is what happens when cPublicRefs is zero. However, in many cases, we
only want to unmarshal an object once. Therefore, if we strengthen the rules to say
when marshaling that we will only unmarshal once, then we no longer have to know when
it is unmarshaled. Therefore, we can give out an arbitrary number of references when
marshaling and basically say "don't call me, except when you die."
</para>
<para>
The most interesting part of a STDOBJREF is the OXID, OID, IPID triple. This triple
identifies any given marshaled interface pointer in the network. OXIDs are apartment
identifiers, and are supposed to be unique network-wide. How this is guaranteed is
currently unknown: the original algorithm Windows used was something like the current
UNIX time and a local counter.
</para>
<para>
OXIDs are generated and registered with the OXID resolver by performing local RPCs
to the RPC subsystem (rpcss.exe). In a fully security-patched Windows system they
appear to be randomly generated. This registration is done using the
<function>ILocalOxidResolver</function> interface, however the exact structure of
this interface is currently unknown.
</para>
<para>
OIDs are object identifiers, and identify a stub manager. The stub manager manages
interface stubs. For each exported COM object there are multiple interfaces and
therefore multiple interface stubs (<function>IRpcStubBuffer</function> implementations).
OIDs are apartment scoped. Each ifstub is identified by an IPID, which identifies
a marshaled interface pointer. IPIDs are apartment scoped.
</para>
<para>
Unmarshaling one of these streams therefore means setting up a connection to the
object exporter (the apartment holding the marshaled interface pointer) and being
able to send RPCs to the right ifstub. Each apartment has its own RPC endpoint and
calls can be routed to the correct interface pointer by embedding the IPID into the
call using RpcBindingSetObject. IRemUnknown, discussed below, uses a reserved IPID.
Please note that this is true only in the current implementation. The native version
generates an IPID as per any other object and simply notifies the SCM of this IPID.
</para>
<para>
Both standard and handler marshaled OBJREFs contains an OXID resolver endpoint which
is an RPC string binding in a DUALSTRINGARRAY. This is necessary because an OXID
alone is not enough to contact the host, as it doesn't contain any network address
data. Instead, the combination of the remote OXID resolver RPC endpoint and the OXID
itself are passed to the local OXID resolver. It then returns the apartment string binding.
</para>
<para>
This step is an optimisation: technically the OBJREF itself could contain the string
binding of the apartment endpoint and the OXID resolver could be bypassed, but by using
this DCOM can optimise out a server round-trip by having the local OXID resolver cache
the query results. The OXID resolver is a service in the RPC subsystem (rpcss.exe) which
implements a raw (non object-oriented) RPC interface called <function>IOXIDResolver</function>.
Despite the identical naming convention this is not a COM interface.
</para>
<para>
Unmarshaling an interface pointer stream therefore consists of
reading the OXID, OID and IPID from the STDOBJREF, then reading
one or more RPC string bindings for the remote OXID resolver.
Then <function>RpcBindingFromStringBinding</function> is used
to convert this remote string binding into an RPC binding handle
which can be passed to the local
<function>IOXIDResolver::ResolveOxid</function> implementation
along with the OXID. The local OXID resolver consults its list
of same-machine OXIDs, then its cache of remote OXIDs, and if
not found does an RPC to the remote OXID resolver using the
binding handle passed in earlier. The result of the query is
stored for future reference in the cache, and finally the
unmarshaling application gets back the apartment string binding,
the IPID of that apartments <function>IRemUnknown</function>
implementation, and a security hint (let's ignore this for now).
</para>
<para>
Once the remote apartments string binding has been located the
unmarshalling process constructs an RPC Channel Buffer
implementation with the connection handle and the IPID of the
needed interface, loads and constructs the
<function>IRpcProxyBuffer</function> implementation for that
IID and connects it to the channel. Finally the proxy is passed
back to the application.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Handling IUnknown</title>
<para>
There are some subtleties here with respect to IUnknown. IUnknown
itself is never marshaled directly: instead a version of it
optimised for network usage is used. IRemUnknown is similar in
concept to IUnknown except that it allows you to add and release
arbitrary numbers of references at once, and it also allows you to
query for multiple interfaces at once.
</para>
<para>
IRemUnknown is used for lifecycle management, and for marshaling
new interfaces on an object back to the client. Its definition can
be seen in dcom.idl - basically the IRemUnknown::RemQueryInterface
method takes an IPID and a list of IIDs, then returns STDOBJREFs
of each new marshaled interface pointer.
</para>
<para>
There is one IRemUnknown implementation per apartment, not per
stub manager as you might expect. This is OK because IPIDs are
apartment not object scoped (In fact, according to the DCOM draft
spec, they are machine-scoped, but this implies apartment-scoped).
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Table marshaling</title>
<para>
Normally once you have unmarshaled a marshaled interface pointer
that stream is dead, you can't unmarshal it again. Sometimes this
isn't what you want. In this case, table marshaling can be used.
There are two types: strong and weak. In table-strong marshaling,
selected by a specific flag to <function>CoMarshalInterface()</function>,
a stream can be unmarshaled as many times as you like. Even if
all the proxies are released, the marshaled object reference is
still valid. Effectively the stream itself holds a ref on the object.
To release the object entirely so its server can shut down, you
must use <function>CoReleaseMarshalData()</function> on the stream.
</para>
<para>
In table-weak marshaling the stream can be unmarshaled many times,
however the stream does not hold a ref. If you unmarshal the
stream twice, once those two proxies have been released remote
object will also be released. Attempting to unmarshal the stream
at this point will yield <function>CO_E_DISCONNECTED</function>.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>RPC dispatch</title>
<para>
Exactly how RPC dispatch occurs depends on whether the exported
object is in a STA or the MTA. If it's in the MTA then all is
simple: the RPC dispatch thread can temporarily enter the MTA,
perform the remote call, and then leave it again. If it's in a
STA things get more complex, because of the requirement that only
one thread can ever access the object.
</para>
<para>
Instead, when entering a STA a hidden window is created implicitly
by COM, and the user must manually pump the message loop in order
to service incoming RPCs. The RPC dispatch thread performs the
context switch into the STA by sending a message to the apartments
window, which then proceeds to invoke the remote call in the right
thread.
</para>
<para>
RPC dispatch threads are pooled by the RPC runtime. When an incoming
RPC needs to be serviced, a thread is pulled from the pool and
invokes the call. The main RPC thread then goes back to listening
for new calls. It's quite likely for objects in the MTA to therefore
be servicing more than one call at once.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Message filtering and re-entrancy</title>
<para>
When an outgoing call is made from a STA, it's possible that the
remote server will re-enter the client, for instance to perform a
callback. Because of this potential re-entrancy, when waiting for
the reply to an RPC made inside a STA, COM will pump the message loop.
That's because while this thread is blocked, the incoming callback
will be dispatched by a thread from the RPC dispatch pool, so it
must be processing messages.
</para>
<para>
While COM is pumping the message loop, all incoming messages from
the operating system are filtered through one or more message filters.
These filters are themselves COM objects which can choose to discard,
hold or forward window messages. The default message filter drops all
input messages and forwards the rest. This is so that if the user
chooses a menu option which triggers an RPC, they then cannot choose
that menu option *again* and restart the function from the beginning.
That type of unexpected re-entrancy is extremely difficult to debug,
so it's disallowed.
</para>
<para>
Unfortunately other window messages are allowed through, meaning that
it's possible your UI will be required to repaint itself during an
outgoing RPC. This makes programming with STAs more complex than it
may appear, as you must be prepared to run all kinds of code any time
an outgoing call is made. In turn this breaks the idea that COM
should abstract object location from the programmer, because an
object that was originally free-threaded and is then run from a STA
could trigger new and untested codepaths in a program.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>Wrapup</title>
<para>
Theres are still a lot of topics that have not been covered:
</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem><para> Format strings/MOPs</para></listitem>
<listitem><para> Apartments, threading models, inter-thread marshalling</para></listitem>
<listitem><para> OXIDs/OIDs, etc, IOXIDResolver</para></listitem>
<listitem><para> IRemoteActivation</para></listitem>
<listitem><para> Complex/simple pings, distributed garbage collection</para></listitem>
<listitem><para> Marshalling IDispatch</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>
Structure of marshalled interface pointers (STDOBJREFs etc)
</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>
ICallFrame
</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>
Runtime class object registration (CoRegisterClassObject), ROT
</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>
Interface pointer swizzling
</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>
IRemUnknown
</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>
Runtime class object registration (CoRegisterClassObject), ROT
</para></listitem>
<listitem><para> Exactly how InstallShield uses DCOM</para></listitem>
</itemizedlist>
<para>
Then there's a bunch of stuff I still don't understand, like ICallFrame,
interface pointer swizzling, exactly where and how all this stuff is
actually implemented and so on.
</para>
<para>
But for now that's enough.
</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>
<title>F
URTHER READING
</title>
<title>F
urther Reading
</title>
<para>
Most of these documents assume you have knowledge only contained in
...
...
@@ -843,6 +1115,12 @@ static ICOM_VTABLE(IDirect3D) d3dvt = {
<itemizedlist>
<listitem><para>
<ulink url="http://www-csag.ucsd.edu/individual/achien/cs491-f97/projects/dcom-writeup.ps">
http://www-csag.ucsd.edu/individual/achien/cs491-f97/projects/dcom-writeup.ps</ulink>
</para></listitem>
<listitem><para>
<ulink url="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/com/htm/cmi_n2p_459u.asp">
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/com/htm/cmi_n2p_459u.asp</ulink>
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment