Commit e40af1cc authored by Michael Jung's avatar Michael Jung Committed by Alexandre Julliard

Implemented CPGetProvParam's PP_ENUMCONTAINERS parameter type.

Added corresponding test. Removed some tabs that slipped in with the last patch.
parent 34400353
......@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ typedef struct tagKEYCONTAINER
DWORD dwFlags;
DWORD dwPersonality;
DWORD dwEnumAlgsCtr;
DWORD dwEnumContainersCtr;
CHAR szName[MAX_PATH];
CHAR szProvName[MAX_PATH];
HCRYPTKEY hKeyExchangeKeyPair;
......@@ -977,6 +978,24 @@ static HCRYPTPROV new_key_container(PCHAR pszContainerName, DWORD dwFlags, PVTab
pKeyContainer->dwPersonality = RSAENH_PERSONALITY_STRONG;
}
}
/* The new key container has to be inserted into the CSP immediately
* after creation to be available for CPGetProvParam's PP_ENUMCONTAINERS. */
if (!(dwFlags & CRYPT_VERIFYCONTEXT)) {
BYTE szRSABase[MAX_PATH];
HKEY hRootKey, hKey;
sprintf(szRSABase, RSAENH_REGKEY, pKeyContainer->szName);
if (pKeyContainer->dwFlags & CRYPT_MACHINE_KEYSET) {
hRootKey = HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE;
} else {
hRootKey = HKEY_CURRENT_USER;
}
RegCreateKeyA(hRootKey, szRSABase, &hKey);
RegCloseKey(hKey);
}
}
return hKeyContainer;
......@@ -2717,6 +2736,8 @@ BOOL WINAPI RSAENH_CPGetProvParam(HCRYPTPROV hProv, DWORD dwParam, BYTE *pbData,
KEYCONTAINER *pKeyContainer;
PROV_ENUMALGS provEnumalgs;
DWORD dwTemp;
BYTE szRSABase[MAX_PATH];
HKEY hKey, hRootKey;
/* This is for dwParam 41, which does not seem to be documented
* on MSDN. IE6 SP1 asks for it in the 'About' dialog, however.
......@@ -2764,6 +2785,47 @@ BOOL WINAPI RSAENH_CPGetProvParam(HCRYPTPROV hProv, DWORD dwParam, BYTE *pbData,
dwTemp = 8;
return copy_param(pbData, pdwDataLen, (CONST BYTE*)&dwTemp, sizeof(dwTemp));
case PP_ENUMCONTAINERS:
if ((dwFlags & CRYPT_FIRST) == CRYPT_FIRST) pKeyContainer->dwEnumContainersCtr = 0;
if (!pbData) {
*pdwDataLen = (DWORD)MAX_PATH + 1;
return TRUE;
}
sprintf(szRSABase, RSAENH_REGKEY, "");
if (dwFlags & CRYPT_MACHINE_KEYSET) {
hRootKey = HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE;
} else {
hRootKey = HKEY_CURRENT_USER;
}
if (RegOpenKeyExA(hRootKey, szRSABase, 0, KEY_READ, &hKey) != ERROR_SUCCESS)
{
SetLastError(ERROR_NO_MORE_ITEMS);
return FALSE;
}
dwTemp = *pdwDataLen;
switch (RegEnumKeyExA(hKey, pKeyContainer->dwEnumContainersCtr, pbData, &dwTemp,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL))
{
case ERROR_MORE_DATA:
*pdwDataLen = (DWORD)MAX_PATH + 1;
case ERROR_SUCCESS:
pKeyContainer->dwEnumContainersCtr++;
RegCloseKey(hKey);
return TRUE;
case ERROR_NO_MORE_ITEMS:
default:
SetLastError(ERROR_NO_MORE_ITEMS);
RegCloseKey(hKey);
return FALSE;
}
case PP_ENUMALGS:
case PP_ENUMALGS_EX:
if (((pKeyContainer->dwEnumAlgsCtr >= RSAENH_MAX_ENUMALGS-1) ||
......
......@@ -1366,6 +1366,31 @@ void test_schannel_provider()
CryptReleaseContext(hProv, 0);
}
void test_enum_container()
{
BYTE abContainerName[256];
DWORD dwBufferLen;
BOOL result, fFound = FALSE;
/* If PP_ENUMCONTAINERS is queried with CRYPT_FIRST and abData == NULL, it returns
* the maximum legal length of container names (which is MAX_PATH + 1 == 261) */
result = CryptGetProvParam(hProv, PP_ENUMCONTAINERS, NULL, &dwBufferLen, CRYPT_FIRST);
ok (result && dwBufferLen == MAX_PATH + 1, "%08lx\n", GetLastError());
/* If the result fits into abContainerName dwBufferLen is left untouched */
dwBufferLen = (DWORD)sizeof(abContainerName);
result = CryptGetProvParam(hProv, PP_ENUMCONTAINERS, abContainerName, &dwBufferLen, CRYPT_FIRST);
ok (result && dwBufferLen == (DWORD)sizeof(abContainerName), "%08lx\n", GetLastError());
/* We only check, if the currently open 'winetest' container is among the enumerated. */
do {
if (!strcmp(abContainerName, "winetest")) fFound = TRUE;
dwBufferLen = (DWORD)sizeof(abContainerName);
} while (CryptGetProvParam(hProv, PP_ENUMCONTAINERS, abContainerName, &dwBufferLen, 0));
ok (fFound && GetLastError() == ERROR_NO_MORE_ITEMS, "%d, %08lx\n", fFound, GetLastError());
}
START_TEST(rsaenh)
{
if (!init_environment())
......@@ -1384,6 +1409,7 @@ START_TEST(rsaenh)
test_import_private();
test_verify_signature();
test_rsa_encrypt();
test_enum_container();
clean_up_environment();
test_schannel_provider();
}
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment