Commit fde88066 authored by Eric Pouech's avatar Eric Pouech Committed by Alexandre Julliard

Fixed protocol packet handling when winedbg is too slow to answer.

parent 4bb180c9
......@@ -20,6 +20,10 @@
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
*/
/* Protocol specification can be found here:
* http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb_32.html
*/
#include "config.h"
#include <assert.h>
......@@ -1788,6 +1792,7 @@ static BOOL extract_packets(struct gdb_context* gdbctx)
unsigned char in_cksum, loc_cksum;
char* ptr;
enum packet_return ret = packet_error;
int num_packet = 0;
while ((ret & packet_last_f) == 0)
{
......@@ -1814,49 +1819,68 @@ static BOOL extract_packets(struct gdb_context* gdbctx)
loc_cksum = checksum(gdbctx->in_buf + 1, plen);
if (loc_cksum == in_cksum)
{
int i;
ret = packet_error;
write(gdbctx->sock, "+", 1);
assert(plen);
/* FIXME: should use bsearch if packet_entries was sorted */
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(packet_entries)/sizeof(packet_entries[0]); i++)
{
if (packet_entries[i].key == gdbctx->in_buf[1]) break;
}
if (i == sizeof(packet_entries)/sizeof(packet_entries[0]))
{
if (gdbctx->trace & GDBPXY_TRC_PACKET)
fprintf(stderr, "Unknown packet request %*.*s\n",
plen, plen, &gdbctx->in_buf[1]);
}
else
{
gdbctx->in_packet = gdbctx->in_buf + 2;
gdbctx->in_packet_len = plen - 1;
if (gdbctx->trace & GDBPXY_TRC_PACKET)
fprintf(stderr, "Packet: %c%*.*s\n",
gdbctx->in_buf[1],
gdbctx->in_packet_len, gdbctx->in_packet_len,
gdbctx->in_packet);
ret = (packet_entries[i].handler)(gdbctx);
if (num_packet == 0) {
int i;
ret = packet_error;
write(gdbctx->sock, "+", 1);
assert(plen);
/* FIXME: should use bsearch if packet_entries was sorted */
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(packet_entries)/sizeof(packet_entries[0]); i++)
{
if (packet_entries[i].key == gdbctx->in_buf[1]) break;
}
if (i == sizeof(packet_entries)/sizeof(packet_entries[0]))
{
if (gdbctx->trace & GDBPXY_TRC_PACKET)
fprintf(stderr, "Unknown packet request %*.*s\n",
plen, plen, &gdbctx->in_buf[1]);
}
else
{
gdbctx->in_packet = gdbctx->in_buf + 2;
gdbctx->in_packet_len = plen - 1;
if (gdbctx->trace & GDBPXY_TRC_PACKET)
fprintf(stderr, "Packet: %c%*.*s\n",
gdbctx->in_buf[1],
gdbctx->in_packet_len, gdbctx->in_packet_len,
gdbctx->in_packet);
ret = (packet_entries[i].handler)(gdbctx);
}
switch (ret & ~packet_last_f)
{
case packet_error: packet_reply(gdbctx, "", 0); break;
case packet_ok: packet_reply(gdbctx, "OK", 2); break;
case packet_done: break;
}
if (gdbctx->trace & GDBPXY_TRC_LOWLEVEL)
fprintf(stderr, "reply-full: %*.*s\n",
gdbctx->out_len, gdbctx->out_len, gdbctx->out_buf);
i = write(gdbctx->sock, gdbctx->out_buf, gdbctx->out_len);
assert(i == gdbctx->out_len);
/* if this fails, we'll have to use POLLOUT...
*/
gdbctx->out_len = 0;
num_packet++;
}
switch (ret & ~packet_last_f)
else
{
case packet_error: packet_reply(gdbctx, "", 0); break;
case packet_ok: packet_reply(gdbctx, "OK", 2); break;
case packet_done: break;
/* FIXME: if we have in our input buffer more than one packet,
* it's very likely that we took too long to answer to a given packet
* and gdb is sending us again the same packet
* We simply drop the second packet. This will lower the risk of error,
* but there's still some race conditions here
* A better fix (yet not perfect) would be to have two threads:
* - one managing the packets for gdb
* - the second one managing the commands...
* This would allow us also the reply with the '+' character (Ack of
* the command) way sooner than what we do know
*/
if (gdbctx->trace & GDBPXY_TRC_LOWLEVEL)
fprintf(stderr, "dropping packet, I was too slow to respond\n");
}
if (gdbctx->trace & GDBPXY_TRC_LOWLEVEL)
fprintf(stderr, "reply-full: %*.*s\n",
gdbctx->out_len, gdbctx->out_len, gdbctx->out_buf);
i = write(gdbctx->sock, gdbctx->out_buf, gdbctx->out_len);
assert(i == gdbctx->out_len);
/* if this fails, we'll have to use POLLOUT...
*/
gdbctx->out_len = 0;
}
else
{
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment