Commit 42525d85 authored by Alex Henrie's avatar Alex Henrie Committed by Alexandre Julliard

ntdll/tests: Fix expected RtlIpv6StringToAddress terminator output.

The "broken" function was applied to the wrong condition in the "ok" statement (RtlIpv6StringToAddress is supposed to set the terminator to the first character after the address, not the second-to-last character of the address). However, since this test is already being skipped on XP and Vista and we really don't need a test for how exactly XP and Vista are broken, we can just delete it. Signed-off-by: 's avatarAlex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: 's avatarAlexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
parent f692d9e7
......@@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ static const struct
NTSTATUS res;
int terminator_offset;
int ip[8];
/* win_broken: older versions of windows do not handle this correctly
/* win_broken: XP and Vista do not handle this correctly
ex_fail: Ex function does need the string to be terminated, non-Ex does not.
ex_skip: test doesn't make sense for Ex (f.e. it's invalid for non-Ex but valid for Ex) */
enum { normal_6, win_broken_6 = 1, ex_fail_6 = 2, ex_skip_6 = 4 } flags;
......@@ -1501,7 +1501,7 @@ static const struct
{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 } },
{ "0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1", STATUS_SUCCESS, 15,
{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x100 } },
{ "0:0:0:0:0:0:0::", STATUS_SUCCESS, 13,
{ "0:0:0:0:0:0:0::", STATUS_SUCCESS, 15,
{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }, win_broken_6 },
{ "0:0:0:0:0:0:13.1.68.3", STATUS_SUCCESS, 21,
{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x10d, 0x344 } },
......@@ -1517,7 +1517,7 @@ static const struct
{ 0, 0x100, 0x200, 0x300, 0x400, 0x500, 0x600, 0x700 } },
{ "1080:0:0:0:8:800:200c:417a", STATUS_SUCCESS, 26,
{ 0x8010, 0, 0, 0, 0x800, 0x8, 0x0c20, 0x7a41 } },
{ "0:a:b:c:d:e:f::", STATUS_SUCCESS, 13,
{ "0:a:b:c:d:e:f::", STATUS_SUCCESS, 15,
{ 0, 0xa00, 0xb00, 0xc00, 0xd00, 0xe00, 0xf00, 0 }, win_broken_6 },
{ "1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:123.123.123.123", STATUS_SUCCESS, 45,
{ 0x1111, 0x2222, 0x3333, 0x4444, 0x5555, 0x6666, 0x7b7b, 0x7b7b } },
......@@ -1531,7 +1531,7 @@ static const struct
{ 0x1111, 0x2222, 0x3333, 0x4444, 0xabab, 0xabab, 0xabab, 0xabab } },
{ "1111:2222:3333:4444:r5555:6666:7777:8888", STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER, 20,
{ 0x1111, 0x2222, 0x3333, 0x4444, 0xabab, 0xabab, 0xabab, 0xabab } },
{ "1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777::", STATUS_SUCCESS, 34,
{ "1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666:7777::", STATUS_SUCCESS, 36,
{ 0x1111, 0x2222, 0x3333, 0x4444, 0x5555, 0x6666, 0x7777, 0 }, win_broken_6 },
{ "1111:2222:3333:4444:5555:6666::", STATUS_SUCCESS, 31,
{ 0x1111, 0x2222, 0x3333, 0x4444, 0x5555, 0x6666, 0, 0 } },
......@@ -2112,13 +2112,6 @@ static void test_RtlIpv6StringToAddress(void)
"[%s] terminator = %p, expected it not to change\n",
ipv6_tests[i].address, terminator);
}
else if (ipv6_tests[i].flags & win_broken_6)
{
PCSTR expected = ipv6_tests[i].address + ipv6_tests[i].terminator_offset;
ok(terminator == expected || broken(terminator == expected + 2),
"[%s] terminator = %p, expected %p\n",
ipv6_tests[i].address, terminator, expected);
}
else
{
ok(terminator == ipv6_tests[i].address + ipv6_tests[i].terminator_offset,
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment