Commit bc5ce279 authored by Francois Gouget's avatar Francois Gouget Committed by Alexandre Julliard

Assorted spelling fixes.

parent 22ff8c9b
......@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ static void test_timer_queue(void)
HANDLE e;
BOOL ret;
/* Test asyncronous deletion of the queue. */
/* Test asynchronous deletion of the queue. */
q = CreateTimerQueue();
todo_wine
ok(q != NULL, "CreateTimerQueue\n");
......@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static void test_timer_queue(void)
todo_wine
ok(GetLastError() == ERROR_IO_PENDING, "DeleteTimerQueueEx\n");
/* Test syncronous deletion of the queue and running timers. */
/* Test synchronous deletion of the queue and running timers. */
q = CreateTimerQueue();
todo_wine
ok(q != NULL, "CreateTimerQueue\n");
......@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ static void test_timer_queue(void)
todo_wine
ok(n5 == 1, "Timer callback 5\n");
/* Test syncronous deletion of the queue with event trigger. */
/* Test synchronous deletion of the queue with event trigger. */
e = CreateEvent(NULL, TRUE, FALSE, NULL);
if (!e)
{
......
......@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
* Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA
*/
/* FIXME:
* - Reference leaks, if they are still existant
* - Reference leaks, if they still exist
* - Files without an index are not handled correctly yet.
* - When stopping/starting, a sample is lost. This should be compensated by
* keeping track of previous index/position.
......@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ static HRESULT AVISplitter_first_request(LPVOID iface)
stream->pos_next = stream->pos;
stream->index_next = stream->index;
/* There should be a a packet queued from AVISplitter_next_request last time
/* There should be a packet queued from AVISplitter_next_request last time
* It needs to be done now because this is the only way to ensure that every
* stream will have at least 1 packet processed
* If this is done after the threads start it could go all awkward and we
......
......@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static const char afile[] = "test.avi";
/* This test doesn't use the quartz filtergraph because it makes it impossible
* to be certain that a thread is really one owned by the avi splitter
* A lot of the decoder filters will also have their own thread, and windows'
* filtergraph has a seperate thread for start/stop/seeking requests.
* filtergraph has a separate thread for start/stop/seeking requests.
* By avoiding the filtergraph all together and connecting streams directly to
* the null renderer I am sure that this is not the case here.
*/
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment