Commit 41278b4c authored by gmarek's avatar gmarek

Bump log level in case of Node eviction

parent aa485ce8
...@@ -491,13 +491,13 @@ func (nc *NodeController) monitorNodeStatus() error { ...@@ -491,13 +491,13 @@ func (nc *NodeController) monitorNodeStatus() error {
if observedReadyCondition.Status == api.ConditionFalse && if observedReadyCondition.Status == api.ConditionFalse &&
decisionTimestamp.After(nc.nodeStatusMap[node.Name].readyTransitionTimestamp.Add(nc.podEvictionTimeout)) { decisionTimestamp.After(nc.nodeStatusMap[node.Name].readyTransitionTimestamp.Add(nc.podEvictionTimeout)) {
if nc.evictPods(node) { if nc.evictPods(node) {
glog.V(4).Infof("Evicting pods on node %s: %v is later than %v + %v", node.Name, decisionTimestamp, nc.nodeStatusMap[node.Name].readyTransitionTimestamp, nc.podEvictionTimeout) glog.V(2).Infof("Evicting pods on node %s: %v is later than %v + %v", node.Name, decisionTimestamp, nc.nodeStatusMap[node.Name].readyTransitionTimestamp, nc.podEvictionTimeout)
} }
} }
if observedReadyCondition.Status == api.ConditionUnknown && if observedReadyCondition.Status == api.ConditionUnknown &&
decisionTimestamp.After(nc.nodeStatusMap[node.Name].probeTimestamp.Add(nc.podEvictionTimeout)) { decisionTimestamp.After(nc.nodeStatusMap[node.Name].probeTimestamp.Add(nc.podEvictionTimeout)) {
if nc.evictPods(node) { if nc.evictPods(node) {
glog.V(4).Infof("Evicting pods on node %s: %v is later than %v + %v", node.Name, decisionTimestamp, nc.nodeStatusMap[node.Name].readyTransitionTimestamp, nc.podEvictionTimeout-gracePeriod) glog.V(2).Infof("Evicting pods on node %s: %v is later than %v + %v", node.Name, decisionTimestamp, nc.nodeStatusMap[node.Name].readyTransitionTimestamp, nc.podEvictionTimeout-gracePeriod)
} }
} }
if observedReadyCondition.Status == api.ConditionTrue { if observedReadyCondition.Status == api.ConditionTrue {
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment