@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ should not prevent future work to allow out-of-tree provisioners.
...
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ should not prevent future work to allow out-of-tree provisioners.
## Design
## Design
This design represents the minimally viable changes required to provision based on storage classe configuration. Additional incremental features may be added as a separte effort.
This design represents the minimally viable changes required to provision based on storage class configuration. Additional incremental features may be added as a separate effort.
We propose that:
We propose that:
...
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ We propose that:
...
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ We propose that:
6. The existing provisioner plugin implementations be modified to accept
6. The existing provisioner plugin implementations be modified to accept
parameters as specified via `StorageClass`.
parameters as specified via `StorageClass`.
7. The persistent volume controller modified to invoke provisioners using `StorageClass` configuration and bind claims with `PersistentVolumeClaim.Spec.Class` to volumes with equivilant `PersistentVolume.Spec.Class`
7. The persistent volume controller modified to invoke provisioners using `StorageClass` configuration and bind claims with `PersistentVolumeClaim.Spec.Class` to volumes with equivalent `PersistentVolume.Spec.Class`
8. The existing alpha dynamic provisioning feature be phased out in the
8. The existing alpha dynamic provisioning feature be phased out in the