faq.xml 39.5 KB
Newer Older
1
<!-- <!DOCTYPE appendix PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook V4.1//EN"> -->
2

3
<appendix id="faq">
4 5
  <title>The Bugzilla FAQ</title>

6 7 8 9
  <para>
    This FAQ includes questions not covered elsewhere in the Guide.
  </para>
  
10 11 12
  <qandaset>


13
    <qandadiv id="faq-general">
14 15 16
      <title>General Questions</title>

      <qandaentry>
17
	<question id="faq-general-information">
18 19 20 21 22 23
	  <para>
	    Where can I find information about Bugzilla?</para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
	    You can stay up-to-date with the latest Bugzilla
24 25
	    information at <ulink url="http://www.bugzilla.org/">
	    http://www.bugzilla.org/</ulink>
26 27 28 29 30
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
31
	<question id="faq-general-license">
32 33 34 35 36 37
	  <para>
	    What license is Bugzilla distributed under?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
38 39 40
	    Bugzilla is covered by the Mozilla Public License.
	    See details at <ulink url="http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/">
	    http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/</ulink>
41 42 43 44 45
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
46
	<question id="faq-general-support">
47 48 49 50 51
	  <para>
	    How do I get commercial support for Bugzilla?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
52 53 54 55 56
          <para>
            <ulink url="http://bugzilla.org/consulting.html">http://bugzilla.org/consulting.html</ulink>
            is a list of people and companies who have asked us to list them
            as consultants for Bugzilla.
          </para>
57
	  <para>
58 59 60 61
	    <ulink url="http://www.collab.net/">www.collab.net</ulink> offers
	    Bugzilla as part of their standard offering to large projects.
	    They do have some minimum fees that are pretty hefty, and generally
	    aren't interested in small projects.
62 63
	  </para>
	  <para>
64 65
	    There are several experienced
	    Bugzilla hackers on the mailing list/newsgroup who are willing
66
	    to make themselves available for generous compensation.
67
	    Try sending a message to the mailing list asking for a volunteer.
68 69 70 71 72
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
73
	<question id="faq-general-companies">
74
	  <para>
75 76
	    What major companies or projects are currently using Bugzilla
	    for bug-tracking?
77 78 79 80
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
81
	    There are <emphasis>dozens</emphasis> of major companies with public
82
	    Bugzilla sites to track bugs in their products.  A few include:
83 84 85
	    <simplelist>
	      <member>Netscape/AOL</member>
	      <member>Mozilla.org</member>
86
	      <member>NASA</member>
87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97
	      <member>Red Hat Software</member>
	      <member>SuSe Corp</member>
	      <member>The Horde Project</member>
	      <member>AbiSource</member>
	      <member>Real Time Enterprises, Inc</member>
	      <member>Eggheads.org</member>
	      <member>Strata Software</member>
	      <member>RockLinux</member>
	      <member>Creative Labs (makers of SoundBlaster)</member>
	      <member>The Apache Foundation</member>
	      <member>The Gnome Foundation</member>
98
	      <member>Ximian</member>
99 100 101 102
	      <member>Linux-Mandrake</member>
	    </simplelist>
	  </para>
	  <para>
103 104
	    Suffice to say, there are more than enough huge projects using Bugzilla
	    that we can safely say it's extremely popular.
105 106 107 108 109
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
110
	<question id="faq-general-maintainers">
111 112 113 114 115 116
	  <para>
	    Who maintains Bugzilla?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
117 118
	    A 
      <ulink url="http://www.bugzilla.org/who_we_are.html">core team</ulink>,
119
      led by Dave Miller (justdave@netscape.com).      
120 121 122 123 124
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
125
	<question id="faq-general-compare">
126
	  <para>
127
	    How does Bugzilla stack up against other bug-tracking databases?
128 129 130 131
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
132 133 134
	    We can't find any head-to-head comparisons of Bugzilla against
	    other defect-tracking software. If you know of one, please
      get in touch. However, from the author's personal
135 136 137 138 139 140
	    experience with other bug-trackers, Bugzilla offers
	    superior performance on commodity hardware, better price
	    (free!), more developer- friendly features (such as stored
	    queries, email integration, and platform independence),
	    improved scalability, open source code, greater
	    flexibility, and superior ease-of-use.
141 142
	  </para>
	  <para>
143
	    If you happen to be a commercial bug-tracker vendor, please
144 145 146
	    step forward with a list of advantages your product has over
      Bugzilla. We'd be happy to include it in the "Competitors"
      section.
147 148 149 150 151
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
152
	<question id="faq-general-bzmissing">
153
	  <para>
154
	    Why doesn't Bugzilla offer this or that feature or compatibility
155
	    with this other tracking software?
156 157 158 159
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
160 161 162 163 164
	    It may be that the support has not been built yet, or that you
	    have not yet found it.  Bugzilla is making tremendous strides in
	    usability, customizability, scalability, and user interface.  It
	    is widely considered the most complete and popular open-source
	    bug-tracking software in existence.
165 166
	  </para>
	  <para>
167 168 169 170
	    That doesn't mean it can't use improvement!
	    You can help the project along by either hacking a patch yourself
	    that supports the functionality you require, or else submitting a
	    "Request for Enhancement" (RFE) using the bug submission interface
171
	    at <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla">bugzilla.mozilla.org</ulink>.
172 173 174 175 176
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
177
	<question id="faq-general-mysql">
178 179
	  <para>
	    Why MySQL?  I'm interested in seeing Bugzilla run on
180
	    Oracle/Sybase/Msql/PostgreSQL/MSSQL.
181 182 183
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
184
	  <para>
185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200
            MySQL was originally chosen because it is free, easy to install,
            and was available for the hardware Netscape intended to run it on.
	  </para>
          <para>
            There is currently work in progress to make Bugzilla work on
            PostgreSQL and Sybase in the default distribution.  You can track
            the progress of these initiatives in bugs <ulink
            url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98304">98304</ulink>
            and <ulink
            url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173130">173130</ulink>
            respectively.
          </para>
          <para>
            Once both of these are done, adding support for additional
            database servers should be trivial.
          </para>
201 202 203 204
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
205
	<question id="faq-general-bonsaitools">
206
	  <para>
207 208
	    Why do the scripts say "/usr/bonsaitools/bin/perl" instead of
	    "/usr/bin/perl" or something else?
209 210 211 212
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
213 214 215 216
	     Mozilla.org uses /usr/bonsaitools/bin/perl, because originally
       Terry wanted a place to put a version of Perl and other tools 
       that was strictly under his control. 
    </para>
217
		<para>
218
		  We always recommend that, if possible, you keep the path
219 220
		  as /usr/bonsaitools/bin/perl, and simply add symlink.  
      This will make upgrading
221 222 223 224 225
		  your Bugzilla much easier in the future.
		</para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

226 227

      <qandaentry>
228
	<question id="faq-general-cookie">
229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239
	  <para>
	    Is there an easy way to change the Bugzilla cookie name?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
	    At present, no.
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>
      
240 241
    </qandadiv>

242
    <qandadiv id="faq-phb">
243
      <title>Managerial Questions</title>
244 245 246
      <para>
	<note>
	  <para>
247
	    Questions likely to be asked by managers. :-)
248 249 250
	  </para>
	</note>
      </para>
251 252

      <qandaentry>
253
	<question id="faq-phb-client">
254
	  <para>
255 256
	    Is Bugzilla web-based, or do you have to have specific software or
	    a specific operating system on your machine?
257 258 259 260
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
261 262
	    It is web and e-mail based.  You can edit bugs by sending specially
	    formatted email to a properly configured Bugzilla, or control via the web.
263 264 265 266 267
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
268
	<question id="faq-phb-integration">
269
	  <para>
270
	    Can Bugzilla integrate with
271
	    Perforce (SCM software)?
272 273 274 275
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
276 277
	    Yes!  You can find more information elsewhere in "The Bugzilla
	    Guide" in the "Integration with Third-Party Products" section.
278 279 280 281 282
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
283
	<question id="faq-phb-projects">
284 285 286 287 288 289
	  <para>
	    Does Bugzilla allow the user to track multiple projects?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
290 291
	    Absolutely!  You can track any number of Products that can each be
            composed of any number of Components.
292 293 294 295 296
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
297
	<question id="faq-phb-sorting">
298
	  <para>
299 300
	    If I am on many projects, and search for all bugs assigned to me, will
	    Bugzilla list them for me and allow me to sort by project, severity etc?
301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
	    Yes.
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
311
	<question id="faq-phb-attachments">
312
	  <para>
313
	    Does Bugzilla allow attachments (text, screenshots, URLs etc)? If yes,
314
	    are there any that are NOT allowed?
315 316 317 318
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
319 320
	    Yes - any sort of attachment is allowed, although administrators can
      configure a maximum size.  
321 322 323
            Bugzilla gives the user the option of either using the MIME-type
            supplied by the browser, choosing from a pre-defined list or
            manually typing any arbitrary MIME-type. 
324 325 326 327 328
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
329
	<question id="faq-phb-priorities">
330
	  <para>
331 332 333
	    Does Bugzilla allow us to define our own priorities and levels? Do we
	    have complete freedom to change the labels of fields and format of them, and
	    the choice of acceptable values?
334 335 336 337
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
338 339 340
	    Yes.  However, modifying some fields, notably those related to bug
	    progression states, also require adjusting the program logic to
	    compensate for the change.
341
	  </para>
342 343 344 345 346 347
	  <para>
	    There is no GUI for adding fields to Bugzilla at this
	    time.  You can follow development of this feature at
	    <ulink
		   url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91037">http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91037</ulink>
	  </para>
348 349 350 351
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
352
	<question id="faq-phb-reporting">
353
	  <para>
354 355
	    Does Bugzilla provide any reporting features, metrics, graphs, etc? You
	    know, the type of stuff that management likes to see. :)
356 357 358 359
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
360 361
	    Yes.  Look at <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/report.cgi">
	    http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/report.cgi</ulink> for samples of what
362
            Bugzilla can do in reporting and graphing.
363 364
	  </para>
	  <para>
365 366 367 368 369 370
            If you can not get the reports you want from the included reporting
            scripts, it is possible to hook up a professional reporting package
            such as Crystal Reports using ODBC. If you choose to do this,
            beware that giving direct access to the database does contain some
            security implications. Even if you give read-only access to the
            bugs database it will bypass the secure bugs features of Bugzilla.
371 372 373 374 375
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
376
	<question id="faq-phb-email">
377
	  <para>
378
	    Is there email notification and if so, what do you see when you get an
379
	    email?
380 381 382 383
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
384 385
	    Email notification is user-configurable.  By default, the bug id and 
      Summary of the bug report accompany each email notification, along with
386
	    a list of the changes made.
387 388 389 390 391
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
392
	<question id="faq-phb-cclist">
393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405
	  <para>
	    Can email notification be set up to send to multiple
	    people, some on the To List, CC List, BCC List etc?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
	    Yes.
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
406
	<question id="faq-phb-emailapp">
407
	  <para>
408
	    Do users have to have any particular
409
	    type of email application?
410 411 412 413
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
414 415
	    Bugzilla email is sent in plain text, the most compatible mail format
	    on the planet.
416 417
	    <note>
	      <para>
418 419 420 421 422 423
		If you decide to use the bugzilla_email integration features
		to allow Bugzilla to record responses to mail with the associated bug,
		you may need to caution your users to set their mailer to "respond
		to messages in the format in which they were sent".  For security reasons
		Bugzilla ignores HTML tags in comments, and if a user sends HTML-based
		email into Bugzilla the resulting comment looks downright awful.
424 425 426 427 428 429 430
	      </para>
	    </note>
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
431
	<question id="faq-phb-data">
432
	  <para>
433 434 435 436
	    Does Bugzilla allow data to be imported and exported? If I had outsiders
	    write up a bug report using a MS Word bug template, could that template be
	    imported into "matching" fields? If I wanted to take the results of a query
	    and export that data to MS Excel, could I do that?
437 438 439
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465
          <para>
            Bugzilla can output buglists as HTML (the default), CSV or RDF.
            The link for CSV can be found at the bottom of the buglist in HTML
            format.  This CSV format can easily be imported into MS Excel or
            other spread-sheet applications.
          </para>
          <para>
            To use the RDF format of the buglist it is necessary to append a
            <computeroutput>&amp;ctype=rdf</computeroutput> to the URL.  RDF
            is meant to be machine readable and thus it is assumed that the
            URL would be generated progmatically so there is no user visible
            link to this format.
          </para>
          <para>
            Currently the only script included with Bugzilla that can import
            data is <filename>importxml.pl</filename> which is intended to be
            used for importing the data generated by <filename>xml.cgi</filename>
            in association with bug moving. Any other use is left as an
            exercise for the user.
          </para>
          <para>
            There are also scripts included in the <filename>contrib/</filename>
            directory for using e-mail to import information into Bugzilla,
            but these scripts are not currently supported and included for
            educational purposes.
          </para>
466 467 468 469
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
470
	<question id="faq-phb-l10n">
471
	  <para>
472 473
	    Has anyone converted Bugzilla to another language to be used in other
	    countries? Is it localizable?
474 475 476 477
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485
            Yes.  For more information including available translated templates,
            see <ulink
            url="http://www.bugzilla.org/download.html">http://www.bugzilla.org/download.html</ulink>.
            The admin interfaces are still not included in these translated
            templates and is therefore still English only.  Also, there may be
            issues with the charset not being declared.  See <ulink
            url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126266">bug 126226</ulink>
            for more information.
486 487 488 489 490
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
491
	<question id="faq-phb-reports">
492
	  <para>
493 494
	    Can a user create and save reports? Can they do this in Word format?
	    Excel format?
495 496 497 498
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
499
	    Yes.  No.  Yes (using the CSV format).
500 501 502 503 504
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
505
	<question id="faq-phb-searching">
506
	  <para>
507 508
	    Does Bugzilla have the ability to search by word, phrase, compound
	    search?
509 510 511 512
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
513 514
	    You have no idea.  Bugzilla's query interface, particularly with the
	    advanced Boolean operators, is incredibly versatile.
515 516 517 518 519
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
520
	<question id="faq-phb-midair">
521
	  <para>
522 523 524
	     Does Bugzilla provide record locking when there is simultaneous access
	    to the same bug? Does the second person get a notice that the bug is in use
	    or how are they notified?
525 526 527 528
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
529 530
	    Bugzilla does not lock records.  It provides mid-air collision detection,
	    and offers the offending user a choice of options to deal with the conflict.
531 532 533 534 535
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
536
	<question id="faq-phb-backup">
537 538 539 540 541 542
	  <para>
	    Are there any backup features provided?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
543 544 545 546
	    MySQL, the database back-end for Bugzilla, allows hot-backup of data.
	    You can find strategies for dealing with backup considerations
	    at <ulink url="http://www.mysql.com/doc/B/a/Backup.html">
	    http://www.mysql.com/doc/B/a/Backup.html</ulink>
547 548 549 550 551
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
552
	<question id="faq-phb-livebackup">
553 554 555 556 557 558
	  <para>
	    Can users be on the system while a backup is in progress?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
559 560
	    Yes.  However, commits to the database must wait
	    until the tables are unlocked.  Bugzilla databases are typically
561 562 563 564 565 566
	    very small, and backups routinely take less than a minute.
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
567
	<question id="faq-phb-maintenance">
568
	  <para>
569 570 571 572 573
	    What type of human resources are needed to be on staff to install and
	    maintain Bugzilla? Specifically, what type of skills does the person need to
	    have? I need to find out if we were to go with Bugzilla, what types of
	    individuals would we need to hire and how much would that cost vs buying an
	    "Out-of-the-Box" solution.
574 575 576 577
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
578 579
	    If Bugzilla is set up correctly from the start, continuing maintenance
      needs are minimal and can be done easily using the web interface.
580 581
	  </para>
	  <para>
582 583
	    Commercial Bug-tracking software typically costs somewhere upwards
	    of $20,000 or more for 5-10 floating licenses.  Bugzilla consultation
584 585
	    is available from skilled members of the newsgroup. Simple questions
      are answered there and then.
586 587 588 589 590
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
591
	<question id="faq-phb-installtime">
592
	  <para>
593 594 595 596 597
	    What time frame are we looking at if we decide to hire people to install
	    and maintain the Bugzilla? Is this something that takes hours or weeks to
	    install and a couple of hours per week to maintain and customize or is this
	    a multi-week install process, plus a full time job for 1 person, 2 people,
	    etc?
598 599 600 601
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
602 603 604 605 606
	    It all depends on your level of commitment.  Someone with much Bugzilla
	    experience can get you up and running in less than a day, and
	    your Bugzilla install can run untended for years.  If your
	    Bugzilla strategy is critical to your business workflow, hire somebody
	    with reasonable UNIX or Perl skills to handle your process management and
607
	    bug-tracking maintenance &amp; customization.
608 609 610 611 612
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
613
	<question id="faq-phb-cost">
614
	  <para>
615 616
	    Is there any licensing fee or other fees for using Bugzilla? Any
	    out-of-pocket cost other than the bodies needed as identified above?
617 618 619 620
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
621 622
	    No.  MySQL asks, if you find their product valuable, that you purchase
	    a support contract from them that suits your needs.
623 624 625 626 627
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>
    </qandadiv>

628
    <qandadiv id="faq-security">
629 630 631
      <title>Bugzilla Security</title>

      <qandaentry>
632
	<question id="faq-security-mysql">
633
	  <para>
634
	    How do I completely disable MySQL security if it's giving me problems
635
	    (I've followed the instructions in the installation section of this guide)?
636 637 638 639
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
640 641
	    Run MySQL like this: "mysqld --skip-grant-tables".  Please remember <emphasis>this
	    makes MySQL as secure as taping a $100 to the floor of a football stadium
642
	    bathroom for safekeeping.</emphasis> 
643 644 645 646 647
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
648
	<question id="faq-security-knownproblems">
649 650 651 652 653 654
	  <para>
	    Are there any security problems with Bugzilla?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
655 656 657
	    The Bugzilla code has undergone a reasonably complete security audit,
      and user-facing CGIs run under Perl's taint mode. However, 
	    it is recommended that you closely examine permissions on your Bugzilla
658 659
	    installation, and follow the recommended security guidelines found
	    in The Bugzilla Guide.
660 661 662 663 664 665
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>


      <qandaentry>
666
	<question id="faq-security-mysqluser">
667
	  <para>
668 669 670
	    I've implemented the security fixes mentioned in Chris Yeh's security
	    advisory of 5/10/2000 advising not to run MySQL as root, and am running into
	    problems with MySQL no longer working correctly.
671 672 673 674
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
675 676 677
	    This is a common problem, related to running out of file descriptors.
	    Simply add "ulimit -n unlimited" to the script which starts
	    mysqld.
678 679 680 681 682
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>
    </qandadiv>

683
    <qandadiv id="faq-email">
684 685 686
      <title>Bugzilla Email</title>

      <qandaentry>
687
	<question id="faq-email-nomail">
688
	  <para>
689 690
	    I have a user who doesn't want to receive any more email from Bugzilla.
	    How do I stop it entirely for this user?
691 692 693 694
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
695
	    The user should be able to set
696 697
	    this in user email preferences (uncheck all boxes) or you can add
            their email address to the <filename>data/nomail</filename> file.
698 699 700 701 702
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
703
	<question id="faq-email-testing">
704
	  <para>
705 706
	    I'm evaluating/testing Bugzilla, and don't want it to send email to
	    anyone but me. How do I do it?
707 708 709 710
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
711
	    Edit the "newchangedmail" Param. Replace "To:" with "X-Real-To:",
712
	    replace "Cc:" with "X-Real-CC:", and add a "To: &lt;youremailaddress&gt;".
713 714 715 716 717
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
718
	<question id="faq-email-whine">
719
	  <para>
720 721
	    I want whineatnews.pl to whine at something more, or other than, only new
	    bugs. How do I do it?
722 723 724 725
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
726 727 728 729 730
	    Try Klaas Freitag's excellent patch for "whineatassigned" functionality.
	    You can find it at<ulink url=" http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6679">
	      http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6679</ulink>. This
	    patch is against an older version of Bugzilla, so you must apply
	    the diffs manually.
731 732 733 734 735
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
736
	<question id="faq-email-procmail">
737
	  <para>
738 739
	    I don't like/want to use Procmail to hand mail off to bug_email.pl.
	    What alternatives do I have?
740 741 742 743
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
744 745
	    You can call bug_email.pl directly from your aliases file, with
	    an entry like this:
746 747
	    <blockquote>
	      <para>
748
		bugzilla-daemon: "|/usr/local/bin/bugzilla/contrib/bug_email.pl"
749
	      </para>
750 751 752 753
	    </blockquote>
	    However, this is fairly nasty and subject to problems; you also
	    need to set up your smrsh (sendmail restricted shell) to allow
	    it.  In a pinch, though, it can work.
754 755 756 757 758
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
759
	<question id="faq-email-mailif">
760
	  <para>
761
	    How do I set up the email interface to submit/change bugs via email?
762 763 764 765
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
766 767
	    You can find an updated README.mailif file in the contrib/ directory
	    of your Bugzilla distribution that walks you through the setup.
768 769 770 771 772
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
773
	<question id="faq-email-sendmailnow">
774
	  <para>
775
	    Email takes FOREVER to reach me from Bugzilla -- it's extremely slow.
776
	    What gives?
777 778 779 780
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
781
	    If you are using an alternate Mail Transport Agent (MTA other than
782 783
	    sendmail), make sure the options given in the "processmail" and other
      scripts for all
784
	    instances of "sendmail" are correct for your MTA.
785 786
	  </para>
	  <para>
787 788
	    If you are using Sendmail, try enabling "sendmailnow" in editparams.cgi.
            If you are using Postfix, you will also need to enable <quote>sendmailnow</quote>.
789 790 791 792 793
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
794
	<question id="faq-email-nonreceived">
795
	  <para>
796
	     How come email from Bugzilla changes never reaches me?
797 798 799 800
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
801 802 803 804
	    Double-check that you have not turned off email in your user preferences.
	    Confirm that Bugzilla is able to send email by visiting the "Log In"
	    link of your Bugzilla installation and clicking the "Email me a password"
	    button after entering your email address.
805 806
	  </para>
	  <para>
807 808 809
	    If you never receive mail from Bugzilla, chances you do not have
	    sendmail in "/usr/lib/sendmail".  Ensure sendmail lives in, or is symlinked
	    to, "/usr/lib/sendmail".
810 811 812 813 814
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>
    </qandadiv>

815
    <qandadiv id="faq-db">
816 817 818
      <title>Bugzilla Database</title>

      <qandaentry>
819
	<question id="faq-db-oracle">
820 821 822 823 824 825
	  <para>
	    I've heard Bugzilla can be used with Oracle?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
826 827 828 829 830
            Red Hat's old version of Bugzilla (based on 2.8) worked on Oracle.
            Red Hat's newer version (based on 2.17.1 and soon to be merged into
            the main distribution) runs on PostgreSQL.  At this time we know of
            no recent ports of Bugzilla to Oracle but do intend to support it
            in the future (possibly the 2.20 time-frame).
831 832 833 834 835
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
836
	<question id="faq-db-corrupted">
837
	  <para>
838 839
	    I think my database might be corrupted, or contain invalid entries. What
	    do I do?
840 841 842 843
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858
	    Run the <quote>sanity check</quote> utility
	    (<filename>./sanitycheck.cgi</filename> in the
	    Bugzilla_home directory) from your web browser to see! If
	    it finishes without errors, you're
	    <emphasis>probably</emphasis> OK.  If it doesn't come back
	    OK (i.e. any red letters), there are certain things
	    Bugzilla can recover from and certain things it can't.  If
	    it can't auto-recover, I hope you're familiar with
	    mysqladmin commands or have installed another way to
	    manage your database.  Sanity Check, although it is a good
	    basic check on your database integrity, by no means is a
	    substitute for competent database administration and
	    avoiding deletion of data.  It is not exhaustive, and was
	    created to do a basic check for the most common problems
	    in Bugzilla databases.
859 860 861 862 863
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
864
	<question id="faq-db-manualedit">
865 866 867 868 869 870
	  <para>
	    I want to manually edit some entries in my database. How?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
871 872
	     There is no facility in Bugzilla itself to do this. It's also generally
	    not a smart thing to do if you don't know exactly what you're doing.
873 874 875 876 877 878 879
	    However, if you understand SQL you can use the <command>mysql</command>
            command line utility to manually insert, delete and modify table
            information.  There are also more intuitive GUI clients available.
            Personal favorites of the Bugzilla team are <ulink
            url="http://www.phpmyadmin.net/">phpMyAdmin</ulink> and <ulink
            url="http://www.mysql.com/downloads/gui-mycc.html">MySQL Control
            Center</ulink>.
880 881 882 883 884
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
885
	<question id="faq-db-permissions">
886
	  <para>
887
	    I think I've set up MySQL permissions correctly, but Bugzilla still can't
888
	    connect.
889 890 891 892
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
893 894
	    Try running MySQL from its binary: "mysqld --skip-grant-tables". This
	    will allow you to completely rule out grant tables as the cause of your
895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905
            frustration. If this Bugzilla is able to connect at this point then
            you need to check that you have granted proper permission to the user
            password combo defined in <filename>localconfig</filename>.
          </para>
          <warning>
            <para>
              Running MySQL with this command line option is very insecure and
              should only be done when not connected to the external network
              as a troubleshooting step.
            </para>
          </warning>
906 907 908 909
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
910
	<question id="faq-db-synchronize">
911
	  <para>
912 913
	    How do I synchronize bug information among multiple different Bugzilla
	    databases?
914 915 916 917
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
918 919 920 921
	    Well, you can synchronize or you can move bugs.  Synchronization will
	    only work one way -- you can create a read-only copy of the database
	    at one site, and have it regularly updated at intervals from the main
	    database.
922 923
	  </para>
	  <para>
924 925 926 927
	    MySQL has some synchronization features builtin to the latest releases.
	    It would be great if someone looked into the possibilities there
	    and provided a report to the newsgroup on how to effectively
	    synchronize two Bugzilla installations.
928 929
	  </para>
	  <para>
930 931
	    If you simply need to transfer bugs from one Bugzilla to another,
	    checkout the "move.pl" script in the Bugzilla distribution.
932 933 934 935 936
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>
    </qandadiv>

937
    <qandadiv id="faq-nt">
938 939 940
      <title>Bugzilla and Win32</title>

      <qandaentry>
941
	<question id="faq-nt-easiest">
942
	  <para>
943
	    What is the easiest way to run Bugzilla on Win32 (Win98+/NT/2K)?
944 945 946 947
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
948 949
	    Remove Windows. Install Linux. Install Bugzilla.
	    The boss will never know the difference.
950 951 952 953 954
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
955
	<question id="faq-nt-bundle">
956 957 958 959 960 961
	  <para>
	    Is there a "Bundle::Bugzilla" equivalent for Win32?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
962 963 964
	    Not currently.  Bundle::Bugzilla enormously simplifies Bugzilla
	    installation on UNIX systems.  If someone can volunteer to
	    create a suitable PPM bundle for Win32, it would be appreciated.
965 966 967 968 969
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
970
	<question id="faq-nt-mappings">
971
	  <para>
972 973
	    CGI's are failing with a "something.cgi is not a valid Windows NT
	    application" error. Why?
974 975 976 977
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
978 979 980
	    Depending on what Web server you are using, you will have to configure
	    the Web server to treat *.cgi files as CGI scripts. In IIS, you do this by
	    adding *.cgi to the App Mappings with the &lt;path&gt;\perl.exe %s %s as the
981 982 983 984 985 986
	    executable.
	  </para>
	  <para>
	    Microsoft has some advice on this matter, as well:
	    <blockquote>
	      <para>
987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994
		"Set application mappings. In the ISM, map the extension for the script
		file(s) to the executable for the script interpreter. For example, you might
		map the extension .py to Python.exe, the executable for the Python script
		interpreter. Note For the ActiveState Perl script interpreter, the extension
		.pl is associated with PerlIS.dll by default. If you want to change the
		association of .pl to perl.exe, you need to change the application mapping.
		In the mapping, you must add two percent (%) characters to the end of the
		pathname for perl.exe, as shown in this example: c:\perl\bin\perl.exe %s %s"
995 996 997 998 999 1000
	      </para>
	    </blockquote>
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

1001
      <qandaentry>
1002
	<question id="faq-nt-dbi">
1003 1004 1005
	  <para>
	    I'm having trouble with the perl modules for NT not being able to talk to
	    to the database.
1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
	    Your modules may be outdated or inaccurate. Try:
	    <orderedlist>
	      <listitem>
		<para>
		  Hitting http://www.activestate.com/ActivePerl
		</para>
	      </listitem>
	      <listitem>
		<para>
		  Download ActivePerl
		</para>
	      </listitem>
	      <listitem>
		<para>
		  Go to your prompt
		</para>
	      </listitem>
	      <listitem>
		<para>
		  Type 'ppm'
		</para>
	      </listitem>
	      <listitem>
		<para>
1034
		  <prompt>PPM></prompt> <command>install DBI DBD-mysql GD</command>
1035 1036
		</para>
	      </listitem>
1037 1038 1039 1040 1041
	    </orderedlist>
	    I reckon TimeDate and Data::Dumper come with the activeperl. You can check
	    the ActiveState site for packages for installation through PPM.
	    <ulink url=" http://www.activestate.com/Packages/">
	      http://www.activestate.com/Packages/</ulink>
1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

    </qandadiv>

1048
    <qandadiv id="faq-use">
1049 1050
      <title>Bugzilla Usage</title>

1051
      <qandaentry>
1052
	<question id="faq-use-changeaddress">
1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064
	  <para>
	    How do I change my user name (email address) in Bugzilla?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
	    New in 2.16 - go to the Account section of the Preferences. You will
      be emailed at both addresses for confirmation.
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

1065
      <qandaentry>
1066
	<question id="faq-use-query">
1067
	  <para>
1068
	    The query page is very confusing.  Isn't there a simpler way to query?
1069 1070 1071 1072
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
1073 1074 1075
	    The interface was simplified by a UI designer for 2.16. Further
      suggestions for improvement are welcome, but we won't sacrifice power for
      simplicity.
1076 1077 1078 1079 1080
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
1081
	<question id="faq-use-accept">
1082
	  <para>
1083 1084
	    I'm confused by the behavior of the "accept" button in the Show Bug form.
	    Why doesn't it assign the bug to me when I accept it?
1085 1086 1087 1088
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
1089
	    The current behavior is acceptable to bugzilla.mozilla.org and most
1090
	    users.  You have your choice of patches
1091
	    to change this behavior, however.
1092
	    <simplelist>
1093 1094 1095 1096 1097
	      <member><ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=8029">
		Add a "and accept bug" radio button</ulink></member>
	      <member><ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=8153">
		"Accept" button automatically assigns to you</ulink></member>
	    </simplelist>
1098 1099
	    Note that these patches are somewhat dated.  You will need to apply
      them manually.  
1100 1101 1102 1103 1104
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
1105
	<question id="faq-use-attachment">
1106
	  <para>
1107 1108
	    I can't upload anything into the database via the "Create Attachment"
	    link.  What am I doing wrong?
1109 1110 1111 1112
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
1113 1114 1115
	    The most likely cause is a very old browser or a browser that is
	    incompatible with file upload via POST.  Download the latest Netscape,
	    Microsoft, or Mozilla browser to handle uploads correctly.
1116 1117 1118 1119 1120
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

      <qandaentry>
1121
	<question id="faq-use-keyword">
1122
	  <para>
1123
	    How do I change a keyword in Bugzilla, once some bugs are using it?
1124 1125 1126 1127
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
1128 1129 1130
	    In the Bugzilla administrator UI, edit the keyword and it will let you
	    replace the old keyword name with a new one.  This will cause a problem
	    with the keyword cache.  Run sanitycheck.cgi to fix it.
1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

    </qandadiv>

1137
    <qandadiv id="faq-hacking">
1138 1139
      <title>Bugzilla Hacking</title>

1140
      <qandaentry>
1141
        <question id="faq-hacking-templatestyle">
1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147
	  <para>
	    What kind of style should I use for templatization?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
1148
	    Gerv and Myk suggest a 2-space indent, with embedded code sections on
1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174
	    their own line, in line with outer tags.  Like this:</para>
	    <programlisting><![CDATA[
<fred>
[% IF foo %]
  <bar>
  [% FOREACH x = barney %]
    <tr>
      <td>
        [% x %]
      </td>
    <tr>
  [% END %]
[% END %]
</fred>
]]></programlisting>

	<para> Myk also recommends you turn on PRE_CHOMP in the template
	initialization to prevent bloating of HTML with unnecessary whitespace.
	</para>

	<para>Please note that many have differing opinions on this subject,
	and the existing templates in Bugzilla espouse both this and a 4-space
	style.  Either is acceptable; the above is preferred.</para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

1175
      <qandaentry>
1176
	<question id="faq-hacking-bugzillabugs">
1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182
	  <para>
	    What bugs are in Bugzilla right now?
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
1183
	    Try <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&amp;bug_status=ASSIGNED&amp;bug_status=REOPENED&amp;product=Bugzilla">
1184 1185
	    this link</ulink> to view current bugs or requests for
	    enhancement for Bugzilla.
1186 1187
	  </para>
	  <para>
1188 1189 1190
	    You can view bugs marked for 2.18 release
	    <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?product=Bugzilla&amp;target_milestone=Bugzilla+2.18">here</ulink>.
	    This list includes bugs for the 2.18 release that have already
1191 1192 1193 1194 1195
	    been fixed and checked into CVS.  Please consult the
	    <ulink url="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/bugzilla/">
	      Bugzilla Project Page</ulink> for details on how to
	    check current sources out of CVS so you can have these
	    bug fixes early!
1196 1197 1198 1199
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

1200
      <qandaentry>
1201
	<question id="faq-hacking-priority">
1202
	  <para>
1203 1204
	    How can I change the default priority to a null value?  For instance, have the default
	    priority be "---" instead of "P2"?
1205 1206 1207 1208
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <para>
1209 1210 1211 1212
	    This is well-documented here: <ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49862">
	    http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49862</ulink>.  Ultimately, it's as easy
	    as adding the "---" priority field to your localconfig file in the appropriate area,
	    re-running checksetup.pl, and then changing the default priority in your browser using
1213
	    "editparams.cgi". 
1214 1215 1216 1217
	  </para>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>

1218
      <qandaentry>
1219
	<question id="faq-hacking-patches">
1220
	  <para>
1221
	    What's the best way to submit patches?  What guidelines should I follow?
1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228
	  </para>
	</question>
	<answer>
	  <blockquote>
	    <orderedlist>
	      <listitem>
		<para>
1229 1230 1231
		  Enter a bug into bugzilla.mozilla.org for the <quote><ulink
                  url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla">Bugzilla</ulink></quote>
                  product.
1232 1233 1234 1235
		</para>
	      </listitem>
	      <listitem>
		<para>
1236
		  Upload your patch as a unified diff (having used "diff -u" against
1237 1238 1239 1240
		  the <emphasis>current sources</emphasis> checked out of CVS),
		  or new source file by clicking
		  "Create a new attachment" link on the bug page you've just created, and
		  include any descriptions of database changes you may make, into the bug
1241 1242
		  ID you submitted in step #1.  Be sure and click the "Patch" checkbox
		  to indicate the text you are sending is a patch!
1243 1244 1245 1246 1247
		</para>
	      </listitem>
	      <listitem>
		<para>
		  Announce your patch and the associated URL
1248
		  (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=XXXXXX) for discussion in
1249 1250 1251 1252
		  the newsgroup (netscape.public.mozilla.webtools).  You'll get a really
		  good, fairly immediate reaction to the implications of your patch,
		  which will also give us an idea how well-received the change would
		  be.
1253 1254 1255 1256
		</para>
	      </listitem>
	      <listitem>
		<para>
1257 1258 1259
		  If it passes muster with minimal modification, the person to whom
		  the bug is assigned in Bugzilla is responsible for seeing the patch
		  is checked into CVS.
1260 1261 1262 1263
		</para>
	      </listitem>
	      <listitem>
		<para>
1264 1265
		  Bask in the glory of the fact that you helped write the most successful
		  open-source bug-tracking software on the planet :)
1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277
		</para>
	      </listitem>
	    </orderedlist>
	  </blockquote>
	</answer>
      </qandaentry>


    </qandadiv>

  </qandaset>

1278
</appendix>
1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284


<!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
Local variables:
mode: sgml
sgml-always-quote-attributes:t
1285 1286
sgml-auto-insert-required-elements:t
sgml-balanced-tag-edit:t
1287
sgml-exposed-tags:nil
1288 1289 1290
sgml-general-insert-case:lower
sgml-indent-data:t
sgml-indent-step:2
1291 1292
sgml-local-catalogs:nil
sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298
sgml-minimize-attributes:nil
sgml-namecase-general:t
sgml-omittag:t
sgml-parent-document:("Bugzilla-Guide.sgml" "book" "chapter")
sgml-shorttag:t
sgml-tag-region-if-active:t
1299 1300
End:
-->