Skip to content

bugzilla
bugzilla
Commit c7434093 authored by jake%acutex.net's avatar jake%acutex.net
Browse files
Options

We don't really need to look for fragments that are pulled in by [% INCLUDE %]…

We don't really need to look for fragments that are pulled in by [% INCLUDE %] or [% PROCESS %]. While removing this code bit doesn't allow us to seperatly check that those fragments exist and compile, they'll be checked atomatically when the the template that wants them is run through the process() routine by the 004template.t test. This issue was raised because bug 98707 introduced a [% BLOCK %] element and the syntax for using that is the same as for including a template fragment.
parent 8a6243f7
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 0 additions and 15 deletions
t/Support/Templates.pm
View file @ c7434093
......@@ -43,19 +43,4 @@ foreach my $file (@files) {
}
}
# Now let's look at the templates and find any other templates
# that are INCLUDEd.
foreach my $file(@testitems) {
open (FILE, $include_path . "/" . $file) || next;
my @lines = <FILE>;
close (FILE);
foreach my $line (@lines) {
if ($line =~ m/\[% (?:INCLUDE|PROCESS) (.+?) /) {
my $template = $1;
push (@testitems, $template) unless $t{$template};
$t{$template} = 1;
}
}
}
1;
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment