Commit fbd73820 authored by bugreport%peshkin.net's avatar bugreport%peshkin.net

Bug 281185: Add boolean charts docs

r=colin,a=justdave
parent 25d5d986
...@@ -300,8 +300,144 @@ ...@@ -300,8 +300,144 @@
<para>Once you've run a search, you can save it as a Saved Search, which <para>Once you've run a search, you can save it as a Saved Search, which
appears in the page footer.</para> appears in the page footer.</para>
<para>Highly advanced querying is done using Boolean Charts. See the <section id="boolean">
Boolean Charts help link on the Search page for more information.</para> <title>Boolean Charts</title>
<para>
Highly advanced querying is done using Boolean Charts.
</para>
<para>
The boolean charts further restrict the set of results
returned by a query. It is possible to search for bugs
based on elaborate combinations of critera.
</para>
<para>
The simplest boolean searches have only one term. These searches
permit the selected left <emphasis>field</emphasis>
to be compared using a
selectable <emphasis>operator</emphasis> to a
specified <emphasis>value.</emphasis>
Using the "And," "Or," and "Add Another Boolean Chart" buttons,
additonal terms can be included in the query, further
altering the list of bugs returned by the query.
</para>
<para>
There are three fields in each row of a boolean search.
</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
<emphasis>Field:</emphasis>
the items being searched
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
<emphasis>Operator:</emphasis>
the comparison operator
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
<emphasis>Value:</emphasis>
the value to which the field is being compared
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
<section id="pronouns">
<title>Pronoun Substitution</title>
<para>
Sometimes, a query needs to compare a field containing
a user's ID (such as ReportedBy) with
a user's ID (such as the user running the query or the user
to whom each bug is assigned). When the operator is either
"equals" or "notequals", the value can be "%reporter%",
"%assignee%", "%qacontact%", or "%user%." The user pronoun
referes to the user who is executing the query or, in the case
of whining reports, the user who will be the recipient
of the report. The reporter, assignee, and qacontact
pronouns refer to the corresponding fields in the bug.
</para>
</section>
<section id="negation">
<title>Negation</title>
<para>
At first glance, negation seems redundant. Rather than
searching for
<blockquote>
<para>
NOT("summary" "contains the string" "foo"),
</para>
</blockquote>
one could search for
<blockquote>
<para>
("summary" "does not contain the string" "foo").
</para>
</blockquote>
However, the search
<blockquote>
<para>
("CC" "does not contain the string" "@mozilla.org")
</para>
</blockquote>
would find every bug where anyone on the CC list did not contain
"@mozilla.org" while
<blockquote>
<para>
NOT("CC" "contains the string" "@mozilla.org")
</para>
</blockquote>
would find every bug where there was nobody on the CC list who
did contain the string. Similarly, the use of negation also permits
complex expressions to be built using terms OR'd together and then
negated. Negation permits queries such as
<blockquote>
<para>
NOT(("product" "equals" "update") OR
("component" "equals" "Documentation"))
</para>
</blockquote>
to find bugs that are neither
in the update product or in the documentation component or
<blockquote>
<para>
NOT(("commenter" "equals" "%assignee%") OR
("component" "equals" "Documentation"))
</para>
</blockquote>
to find non-documentation
bugs on which the assignee has never commented.
</para>
</section>
<section id="multiplecharts">
<title>Multiple Charts</title>
<para>
The terms within a single row of a boolean chart are all
constraints on a single piece of data. If you are looking for
a bug that has two different people cc'd on it, then you need
to use two boolean charts. A search for
<blockquote>
<para>
("cc" "contains the string" "foo@") AND
("cc" "contains the string" "@mozilla.org")
</para>
</blockquote>
would return only bugs with "foo@mozilla.org" on the cc list.
If you wanted bugs where there is someone on the cc list
containing "foo@" and someone else containing "@mozilla.org",
then you would need two boolean charts.
<blockquote>
<para>
First chart: ("cc" "contains the string" "foo@")
</para>
<para>
Second chart: ("cc" "contains the string" "@mozilla.org")
</para>
</blockquote>
The bugs listed will be only the bugs where ALL the charts are true.
</para>
</section>
</section>
</section> </section>
<section id="list"> <section id="list">
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment