Commit 4a4f7e34 authored by Francois Gouget's avatar Francois Gouget Committed by Alexandre Julliard

glu32: A couple of spelling fixes in comments.

parent f81f7f47
......@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ GLdouble __gl_edgeEval( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w )
{
/* Given three vertices u,v,w such that VertLeq(u,v) && VertLeq(v,w),
* evaluates the t-coord of the edge uw at the s-coord of the vertex v.
* Returns v->t - (uw)(v->s), ie. the signed distance from uw to v.
* If uw is vertical (and thus passes thru v), the result is zero.
* Returns v->t - (uw)(v->s), i.e. the signed distance from uw to v.
* If uw is vertical (and thus passes through v), the result is zero.
*
* The calculation is extremely accurate and stable, even when v
* is very close to u or w. In particular if we set v->t = 0 and
......@@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ GLdouble __gl_transEval( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w )
{
/* Given three vertices u,v,w such that TransLeq(u,v) && TransLeq(v,w),
* evaluates the t-coord of the edge uw at the s-coord of the vertex v.
* Returns v->s - (uw)(v->t), ie. the signed distance from uw to v.
* If uw is vertical (and thus passes thru v), the result is zero.
* Returns v->s - (uw)(v->t), i.e. the signed distance from uw to v.
* If uw is vertical (and thus passes through v), the result is zero.
*
* The calculation is extremely accurate and stable, even when v
* is very close to u or w. In particular if we set v->s = 0 and
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment