Commit c6d4df8b authored by Huw Davies's avatar Huw Davies Committed by Alexandre Julliard

ole32: Fix several memory leaks in the tests.

Found by Valgrind.
parent f7be3645
......@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static void testProps(void)
ok(var.vt == VT_LPSTR && !lstrcmpA(U(var).pszVal, val),
"Didn't get expected type or value for property (got type %d, value %s)\n",
var.vt, U(var).pszVal);
PropVariantClear(&var);
/* read clipboard format */
spec.ulKind = PRSPEC_PROPID;
......@@ -282,6 +283,7 @@ static void testProps(void)
ok(var.vt == VT_LPSTR && !lstrcmpA(U(var).pszVal, val),
"Didn't get expected type or value for property (got type %d, value %s)\n",
var.vt, U(var).pszVal);
PropVariantClear(&var);
IPropertyStorage_Release(propertyStorage);
IPropertySetStorage_Release(propSetStorage);
......@@ -364,11 +366,13 @@ static void testCodepage(void)
ok(hr == S_OK, "ReadMultiple failed: 0x%08x\n", hr);
ok(var.vt == VT_LPSTR && !strcmp(U(var).pszVal, "hi"),
"Didn't get expected type or value for property\n");
PropVariantClear(&var);
/* This seemingly non-sensical test is to show that the string is indeed
* interpreted according to the current system code page, not according to
* the property set's code page. (If the latter were true, the whole
* string would be maintained. As it is, only the first character is.)
*/
var.vt = VT_LPSTR;
U(var).pszVal = (LPSTR)wval;
hr = IPropertyStorage_WriteMultiple(propertyStorage, 1, &spec, &var, 0);
ok(hr == S_OK, "WriteMultiple failed: 0x%08x\n", hr);
......@@ -376,6 +380,8 @@ static void testCodepage(void)
ok(hr == S_OK, "ReadMultiple failed: 0x%08x\n", hr);
ok(var.vt == VT_LPSTR && !strcmp(U(var).pszVal, "h"),
"Didn't get expected type or value for property\n");
PropVariantClear(&var);
/* now that a property's been set, you can't change the code page */
spec.ulKind = PRSPEC_PROPID;
U(spec).propid = PID_CODEPAGE;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment