- 17 Feb, 2023 17 commits
-
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
Spotted by Eric Pouech.
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Paul Gofman authored
-
Paul Gofman authored
-
Paul Gofman authored
-
Paul Gofman authored
-
Paul Gofman authored
-
Alistair Leslie-Hughes authored
We need to use the ODBC v1 function SQLColAttributesW, to ensure that we use the lowest verion available. This ODBC function internally will call SQLColAttribute or SQLColAttributesW depending on what the driver supports.
-
Brendan Shanks authored
-
Brendan Shanks authored
Based on a patch by Tim Clem <tclem@codeweavers.com>. Wine-Bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
-
Zebediah Figura authored
-
- 16 Feb, 2023 18 commits
-
-
Alex Henrie authored
This prevents a bad free if RtlDosPathNameToNtPathName_U fails.
-
Jason Millard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Brendan Shanks authored
Fixes compile error on ARM64 macOS. Wine-Bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54256
-
Brendan Shanks authored
-
Rémi Bernon authored
Wine-Bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54431
-
Rémi Bernon authored
Wine-Bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54431
-
Francois Gouget authored
-
Francois Gouget authored
Destroying the editor window should render all the formats so they are still available after.
-
Nikolay Sivov authored
-
Alistair Leslie-Hughes authored
When using msadosql it always returns the number of records affected or records returned by a SELECT statement. The access database, which is what the defaults tests are using doesn't return the number of records for a SELECT. It's a known issue that you have to MoveLast/MoveFirst before the correct RecordCount value is return for an Access DB.
-
Alistair Leslie-Hughes authored
-
Alistair Leslie-Hughes authored
-
Connor McAdams authored
Signed-off-by: Connor McAdams <cmcadams@codeweavers.com>
-
Connor McAdams authored
Signed-off-by: Connor McAdams <cmcadams@codeweavers.com>
-
Connor McAdams authored
Signed-off-by: Connor McAdams <cmcadams@codeweavers.com>
-
Connor McAdams authored
Signed-off-by: Connor McAdams <cmcadams@codeweavers.com>
-
- 15 Feb, 2023 5 commits
-
-
Eric Pouech authored
Note: this patch changes the results of EnumProcessModules for a wow64 target process called from a 64bit process. It now returns: - main module and all loaded 64bit modules (Wine multi-arch wow64 and Windows) - main module only (Wine "old" wow64). It used to return all the 32bit modules. You now must use EnumProcessModulesEx(..., LIST_MODULES_32BIT) to get that result. Signed-off-by: Eric Pouech <eric.pouech@gmail.com>
-
Eric Pouech authored
Signed-off-by: Eric Pouech <eric.pouech@gmail.com>
-
Eric Pouech authored
In order to get 32bit modules for a wow64 process. Signed-off-by: Eric Pouech <eric.pouech@gmail.com>
-
Eric Pouech authored
In order to get 32bit modules for a wow64 process. Signed-off-by: Eric Pouech <eric.pouech@gmail.com>
-
Eric Pouech authored
Showing that Wine incorrectly reports, for a Wow64 process, the system DLLs from within the wow64 directory while they should be from system32. Signed-off-by: Eric Pouech <eric.pouech@gmail.com>
-