- 30 Dec, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Anton Midyukov authored
check conditions of make for equality of variables with an empty value instead of check definition. A defined but empty variable under all these conditions results errors.
-
- 15 Apr, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Anton Midyukov authored
-
- 12 Apr, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Anton Midyukov authored
-
- 16 Mar, 2021 2 commits
-
-
Anton Midyukov authored
For riscv64 available grub-efi. Needed added support for mkimage (mki-copy-efiboot-chrooted).
-
Anton Midyukov authored
More than one BOOTLOADER may be available for the same architecture. Set IMAGE_PACKTYPE in boot/iso, there is no point in duplicating in different features. Closes ALT bug 39786.
-
- 17 Feb, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Anton Midyukov authored
mki-copy-grubaa64boot more not needed. In addition, it did not support the config in boot/grub instead of EFI/BOOT. Needed mkimage >= 0.2.38-alt1
-
- 30 Aug, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Anton Midyukov authored
-
- 19 Aug, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy authored
ieee1275boot bootloader support was added in mkimage 0.2.27.
-
- 25 Jul, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Michael Shigorin authored
Every .iso was assumed to be bootable since the very beginning[*], and isoboot images were deemed to be x86 isolinux ones; this didn't change with basic ppc/armh support as I never ran into hardware that would _boot_ those ISOs, not only run the code, and it was only e2k isodata project that finally forced this refactoring. It's still not perfect: pack and syslinux features still end up somewhat interwoven, and too much places care for architecture the image is being built for (instead of archdep features tossing their appropriate bits and pieces in). Should help: - any-arch regarding isodata images; - {x86,aarch64}/efi by decoupling isoboot and isolinux; - ppc{,64} as introducing yaboot support will be easier now; - mipsel{,64} too, hopefully. * I knew of school addon images baked with mkimage-profiles-desktop but postponed and then neglected the whole problem for years...
-
- 21 May, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Michael Shigorin authored
It needs (and has) no isolinux in the first place; this is also the situation with most or all non-x86 arches, the code should probably reflect that.
-
- 29 Mar, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Michael Shigorin authored
Yes these bits are related to distro/ prefixed images still the overgeneralization in distro.mk didn't pay off but rather hid a bug with the only boot/isolinux in use having no dependency on use/syslinux (which is required). Maybe this will get revisited when we have other kinds of bootable images with other bootloaders (vm/ ones care for themselves as of today).
-