the spelling errors so tinderbox doesn't barf, part two fixes
t/006spellcheck.t and adds some more new words to check for.

Part 1 patch by myself, r=timeless
Part 2 patch by MattyT. r=zach (myself)
a=justdave

Permission to do so granted by: justdave, joel, jake, ddk, gerv, bbaetz,
and myself (as gleamed from bonsai and the contributors lines and
indicated in the bug report). a=justdave.

Add a test to check for speling errors. It only currently checks for two simple errors that used to be in checksetup.pl, more errors can and will be added in the future.

Bug 147151, no review needed for tests

test code. Patch makes the tests much better now.

r=zach x2

No review needed for tests at this time.

Don't rely on the TEST_VERBOSE environment variable (no longer exported from runtests.sh) and instead print to the TESTOUT file handle pulled in from Test::More.  This will allow the testing backend to check for verbosity rather than having to handle it in the .t files.

Bug 106424 - We weren't going orange on warnings such as "used only once".  This script now properly outputs the --WARNING and fails on such a condition.

Bug 103664 - Tests should "use strict;" and not contain any tabs.  We should also use the TEST_VERBOSE environment variable instead of VERBOSE.
Patch by David D. Kilzer <ddkilzer@theracingworld.com>
Additional edits by myself to add the emacs mode line.  Also, the change to runtests.sh was done by me.

No review needed for tests at this time. NOT PART OF BUILD

No review needed for tests at this time. NOT PART OF BUILD

bug 97976.

No review required for tests at this time. NOT_PART_OF_BUILD

Fix to make the tests generate the list of files to test instead of having to update the list manually whenever a file is added
or removed. The main logic is in t/Support/Files.pm, changes to the test files are needed to allow it to function properly.

NOT_PART_OF_BUILD. No review needed for tests at this time.

Addition of Files.pm which will be used shortly by 1.t (soon to be 1compile.t) which contains the list of files to test. This is important so that we can bring it into other tests which check files for content, etc... 

No review required for tests as of now as per Dave.