- 04 Dec, 2023 14 commits
-
-
Etaash Mathamsetty authored
-
Alex Henrie authored
-
Daniel Lehman authored
-
Nikolay Sivov authored
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Sivov <nsivov@codeweavers.com>
-
Nikolay Sivov authored
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Sivov <nsivov@codeweavers.com>
-
Nikolay Sivov authored
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Sivov <nsivov@codeweavers.com>
-
Nikolay Sivov authored
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Sivov <nsivov@codeweavers.com>
-
Piotr Caban authored
-
Piotr Caban authored
-
Zhiyi Zhang authored
push_dc_driver() places drivers based on their priorities, so the newly created driver is not necessarily on top. Thus in windrv_CreateDC(), find_dc_driver() should be used to find the DIB driver instead of assuming the DIB driver is the top driver, which could be the path driver because it has a higher priority. The exact wrong code path was: 1. A path driver with priority 400 is created for a DC. 2. windrv_CreateDC() is called to create a window driver for the DC. 3. Then in dibdrv_CreateDC(), push_dc_driver() is called with 'dev' pointing to the top driver, which is the path driver. 4. push_dc_driver() updates 'dev' to point to the address of the next driver because DIB driver has a lower 300 priority. 5. The DIB driver is assigned to 'dev', which is not the original parameter passed into push_dc_driver(). 6. In windrv_CreateDC(), get_dibdrv_pdev(*dev) is called, assuming the top driver is the DIB driver. But actually the top driver that '*dev' points to is still the path driver. The added tests can demonstrate the memory corruption before this fix is applied.
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
- 03 Dec, 2023 5 commits
-
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
Alexandre Julliard authored
-
- 01 Dec, 2023 21 commits
-
-
Robert Wilhelm authored
Wine-Bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55185
-
Nikolay Sivov authored
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Sivov <nsivov@codeweavers.com>
-
Brendan Shanks authored
LLVM no longer allows non-private labels to appear between .cfi_startproc/endproc when targeting Mach-O. Based on a patch by Jacek Caban. Wine-Bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55863
-
Rémi Bernon authored
-
Rémi Bernon authored
-
Rémi Bernon authored
-
Rémi Bernon authored
-
Rémi Bernon authored
-
Rémi Bernon authored
-
Rémi Bernon authored
-
Rémi Bernon authored
-
Myah Caron authored
Wine-Bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55920Signed-off-by: Myah Caron <qsniyg@protonmail.com>
-
Fabian Maurer authored
In rare cases we get an event during the second iteration of the loop, changing the first element. This would lead to an assertion later. Wine-Bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55054
-
Fabian Maurer authored
-
Fabian Maurer authored
-
Fabian Maurer authored
-
Fabian Maurer authored
-
Fabian Maurer authored
-
Fabian Maurer authored
-
Alex Henrie authored
-
Jacek Caban authored
-